For centuries Democracy has been based on voting people. We know all of that: Greece, the French revolution, the modern democracies.
Seems like it is not working fine.
We’ve been voting for people who never had responsibilities for what they do. It is like if we’d go to a company and ask for a service, we give money for that service and the company isn’t responsible to provide that service. It doesn’t seem so funny. Other than not being funny, it is far from a concept called justice: there’s no balance. It is not happening what we really want.


What if you shouldn't vote for people, but for projects? At first, you wouldn’t be biased by knowing who had the idea nor who’s going to realize it. You just say if you want that idea to become real or not. Then, when the idea reach enough voting level, the complete truth comes: who voted for, who appreciated it, who’s committed to realize it. Transparency at the best level.
If the people committed don’t manage to realize the goal, the idea remains, and awaits for completion. If the people are corrupted, you can substitute the people in charge anytime by submitting and voting a change. That idea, that need, that will wants to be realized.


Now imagine a million people sending one euro to a common fund. The fund grows and ideas pop out. Some are loved, some other seem good investments, some other have great commitment, and so on. The ideas are never cancelled. The fund is pre-allocated in the different projects proportionally. When one idea gets the 100% of its budget pre-allocated, becomes approved. Loved ideas get more chances to be seen in the first, random view. Another way to vote is with your commitment: you would participate in that project or would like working in it. Another vote is money, just to say that it is a good investment. You also have an automated one, that is called “memory” and it's based on an AI: if a similar idea was good, then this idea would have a "good" “memory”. We also have a vote for bizarre ideas!

7 stages are set for the committed people to start their business. At every milestone, they get incremental amounts of money. Anybody can check if they’re doing a good job, during the seven phases and afterwards. When the business starts, the people committed get paid: that’s great for them as it’s the job they were committed to! It’s like an identity-based employment market.
And when the business idea gets its revenues, after having paid the wages, the earnings go back to Cooperacy, so that other people may realize their ideas. This is whay we call redistributive funding.
It’s a growing cycle that will allow a cooperative economy to be parallel with the competitive one. Not everybody loves competition.

Here you can be different and develop projects together for a mutual enjoyment.
What would you like to do together?